Theory of No Return

(https://www.quora.com/What-is-spaghettification)

The perceived belief of time and resources; precisely energy as infinite is untrue. Such belief and the action resulting from it by the economic man on the basis of resources divided in terms of the long and short term may seem well to put bluntly arrogant, what could be more precise is that such is not limited to the time they are used but the intrinsic value they contain at present and the future. As resources once exploited can never return back to that which was original (seemingly indefinite for the economic man). Even the continuous life cycles of living beings change over time; with either evolution or mutation. The monkey of hundreds of millions of years ago and the ones now living are psychologically as well as physically very different and so is the environment they live in. The past being has to let go of their vestigial organs for the sake of survival which is also the case for the energy that fuels life as we know it.  

Short-term and long-term perception is workable in a practical sense, Yet it accelerates the destructive nature of man. As, Man is an organism that can't make its own food, not in the sense of cooking and such, but in terms of the photosynthesis as of plants, there always emerges the irrational side of an economic man who is driven by the need to profit on the expense of the life in the planet. More so he leans towards over-production or simply over-utilization beyond the satiety point, without moderation in the monetary world whose success is determined by the profit and loss; despite his philosophy of maximum utility with the least cost. According to his figures, the cost is borne in terms of money, but it is just the representation of the resources, so the actual bearer of the burden is nature and the life-forms for the sake of his benefits. Likewise, there are many self-destructive consequences due to activities based in this economic theory, one excellent example:

  China’s environmental crisis is one of the most pressing challenges to emerge from the country’s rapid industrialization. Its economic rise, in which GDP grew on average 10 percent each year for more than a decade, has come at the expense of its environment and public health. China is the world’s largest source of carbon emissions, and the air quality of many of its major cities fails to meet international health standards. Life expectancy north of the Huai River is  5.5 years lower than in the south due to air pollution (life expectancy in China is 75.3 years, according to 2013 UN figures). Severe water contamination and scarcity have compounded land deterioration. Environmental degradation threatens to undermine the country’s growth and exhausts public patience with the pace of reform. It has also bruised China’s international standing and endangered domestic stability as the ruling party faces increasing scrutiny and public discontent. More recently, amid waning economic growth, leaders in Beijing appear more determined to institute changes to stem further degradation. 

(China’s Environmental Crisis: www.cfr.org: January 18, 2016)

The summation from the above news excerpt is that the rationality of man overrules the rationality of nature, a nation, the aggregate of human identity always moves forward to become more powerful; politically, socially, and economically. Though the underlining principle is the greater good for all especially those who are under the line of poverty or economic disparity, it without a doubt creates an imbalance in the environment, for it is natural that taking a part of its content will obviously create a vacuum which leads to consequences as mentioned above as well as raises the so-called long term value with diminishing resources. The immediate and lasting damage of such human activities creates a chain reaction that accelerates overtime whose origin goes back to the point time of human history the so-called industrial revolution and the present "information age" The issue of environmental conservation and save the planet is taking some brilliant approaches to mitigate the human encroachment in nature, Yet the pace at which the resources are exhausted and the rate by which it is replenished has so much deviation, that there is almost no surplus for the coming generations.

Likewise, the crux of the theory is that everything that goes on. The young days of one elderly can never return to him/her. S/he may revisit it in memories of her own organic mind or in the physical manifestation of dairies she had kept or the time when children play their innocent games, the reality is that the time what she had done can not return, the dresses she had worn or the first kiss of her lover. The living eventually has to die due to failure to replace the dead or dying parts that keep it alive only for so long. According to the Wear and tear theory; Cells and tissues have vital parts that wear out resulting in aging. Like components of an aging car, parts of the body eventually wear out from repeated use. (Modern Biological Theories of Aging: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov: August 1, 2010)

Thus, even if we take the economic theory, so-called the scarcity theory into account, it assumes that the availability of limited resources leads to the production and distribution of limited goods, leading to initial and medium stage high finite return and eventually with time the return diminishes and there is a loss.  Therefore, there is a need for moderation in resource utilization, so with enough time of replenishment of the resources, mankind's continuation, as well as life on the planet is assured. To do so, there should be a suitable replacement for vacuums in the life-cycle of an organism that is sustainable and adaptable to the changing scenario over time.